Sean Diddy Combs reveals nature of US judicial lawfare against blacks

Sean Diddy Combs

THERE is a well-established tradition among blacks that says that as long as a black entrepreneur is serving white interests or subservient, the sky is the limit for him.

Once he shows some independence, all judicial hell breaks loose.

Using the law against opponents, sometimes referred to as judicial lawfare, is not necessarily intended to win cases, but to break the victim financially.

The fact that now US President Donald Trump was subjected to such lawfare, only serves to prove t blacks that the weapon is rarely used against whites.

Brother Sean Diddy Combs’ wealth is estimated at US$500 million and has been at the head of Combs Global, a conglomerate company serving as a consolidation of various musical, water and wine distribution companies, and fashion labels as well since 2003.

In the global market, he worked under the shadow of Diageo, a British alcohol distribution company.

His problems with US lawfare started after he had accused Diageo of trying to block him from pursing his own West Indian alcohol label, which would rival the wines already in the market.

Diageo, according to our sources, called the “Feds” (Federal Bureau of Investigations) on him.

In their history, the Feds have lost only 3% of the cases they have prosecuted.

According to judge Andrew Napolitano, their method is to throw the book at the suspects, paint a bad picture of the suspect by releasing their list of charges, thus prejudicing the jury a priori.

In short, as we go to press, there is virtually no informed person in the US who does not “know” that Brother Diddy is a horrible person.

A video of Diddy beating up his girlfriend in a hotel lobby and dragging her by the hair to his room (2019) has been resuscitated.

But here is the issue, the police were called, Cassie Ventura refused to press charges, and it appears that the security guard who could have acted as witness, went home that night with US$600 in his pocket.

The statute of limitations has already passed.

As we speak, May 19, Sister Cassie has been giving evidence in a court of law. She has been saying horrible things about Diddy.

Two witnesses have corroborated the violence to which she was subjected to.

In one case, the witness heard the beatings and Sister Cassie ran from the room into his lap for protection.

Then there is a story about a tunnel used for voodoo rituals. Another witness allegedly implies that Congressional minority leader Hakeem Jeffries was a regular visitor to the “freak off parties”.

One party mentioned involved a musical imitating Cuban revolutionaries Fidel Castro and Che Guevarra. The musical ends in a free for all gay sexual orgy.

In another “freak offs”, Cassie says that a human pissed into her mouth while guests enjoyed the scene.

The charge against Diddy is that he trafficked humans across state lines for sexual purposes.

While these humans could have been girls under age, witnesses have alluded to the presence of male human “studs”, who mixed freely with guests.

Actors like Brother Will Smith and his wife Sister Jada and the renowned Denzel Washington have been mentioned as guests.

Moreover, the reader should not assume that Trump is involved in some sort of revenge.

The Democrats are the brainy party and it was the Joe Biden administration that locked up Diddy, allegedly in order to protect the names of politicians like Kamala Harris, who was running for president.

To make sure Diddy would not squeal, he was locked up in isolation, refused bail, even though he offered US$50 million as security.

According to Joe Cascarelli, who sat in the witness box, Cassie’s case was that Diddy “instituted a system of abuse and control over her life and career for more than a decade.”

When she refused to comply, prosecutors say Diddy “dangled ever disappearing music opportunities, beat her when she stepped out of line, and plied her with drugs, forcing her into marathon sex sessions with male prostitutes while he taped the encounters.”

Nobody, including the defence attorneys, is denying that Diddy is the “baldest guy” ever.

Indeed, they acknowledge that Diddy is a violent brother.

But all these allegations have nothing to do with trafficking in humans across state lines for the purpose of illicit sex.

The defence further argues that Diddy met Cassie in 2005 when she was 19 and remained in good standing until 2019 when she filed a suit, hoping to get at Diddy’s millions.

As for the parties themselves, they were regarded as the “go-to party of the year” by politicians and men and women of substance across the political and social spectrum.

The allegations that Diddy made his business rival disappear are based on one shooting incident.

A bad guy, Jonathan Oddi, under the influence of certain “stuff” supposed to be drugs, shot at a policeman at Trump Towers Hotel in Miami, Florida, in 2019.

This bad person says: “I had sex with Cassie and (Diddy). Basically, Diddy would (bad word) tell me what to do to Cassie. I had like 15 encounters, and I had lots of business. I was a sex slave-for them, that is what I was.”

Oddi claims he had a video, but that video has not been handed over to the jury.

On the face of it (prima facie) all these are useless allegations proving only one thing that Diddy is a very bad person.

There is no proof that Oddi was enslaved, nor was he trafficked across state lines against his will.

The idea which serves the “Feds” well is to give the impression that the suspect like Diddy must not be allowed to walk the streets.

*Ken Mufuka is a Zimbabwean patriot. He writes from the US.

Related Topics