The late Sunday Mail editor, Willie Musarurwa would call a young reporter and ask him a simple question. “Young man, what is your story line?” the great man would ask.
As we say good-bye to 2025 in the US, one story that refuses to be left behind is the murder of Charlie Kirk, September 10, and the subsequent events that followed an attempted cover up by US authorities.
The story is important because it brings together three streams, that have hitherto been regarded as sacred until the advent of social media.
The US government, as has happened in the past, is accused of covering up the real murderers behind president J.F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King and now Charlie Kirk.
The second stream, is why the US government would want to cover up these murders.
Is it possible that the US authorities might have conspired (or at least known ahead of time) and allowed the events to pass.
The third stream is the juiciest part of all.
Conspiracy theorists have tied some of the most gruesome events to a Middle East country that has, in the past, boasted that it will murder its enemies, no matter where they are-no trial, no jury, simply murder them because that country saw them as harming their expansionist cause.
- BCC flights multiple tenders
- Teguru wins top bodybuilding championship
- American record label hunts for Zim talent
- DJ Anusa to sign contract with US record label
Keep Reading
Perhaps we can add another stream, this one of my own inventions.
When examining the evidence as presented by investigative podcasters, Sister Candace Owens, Megyn Kelly, Jimmy Dore and Ticker Carlson, the question then arises, shall the reader believe his lying eyes, or believe obvious government lies that don’t add up.
Charlie Kirk was a political mover and shaker in Turning Point, USA, a college organisation that helped to rejuvenate the youth vote in the election of Donald J. Trump in November 2024.
Behind the scenes, Turning Point, USA, was tied to Jewish mega-donors, whose hidden agenda was to marry US foreign policy to the genocidal behavior of Israel in Gaza and the Middle East.
That is the heart of the story.
The deception, according to professors Jeffrey Sachs, and John Mearsheimer, had succeeded for the last 70 years, as long as the news media in the US and Europe was under the thump of the Zionists.
Mearsheimer, who challenged this Zionist monster in 2006, suffered smear campaigns, while his collaborator, Steve Walt, had to forgo his career projection for a provostship at Harvard.
The Zionists employed the “shut-your mouth” strategy.
In the Kirk murder, the official explanation was that a messed-up kid, 22-year-old, Tyler Robisnon, climbed up to the roof of a building, from a distance of 1 500 yards, using a 306 Mauser rifle, shot Kirk in the neck before an audience of 5 000 witnesses.
One lie is enough to destroy this story. Tyler has no history of being a “shootist” (trained shooter). A 306 Mauser rifle is used in hunting Moose and big deer. It would have blown off Kirk’s head and spluttered his audience with blood.
Reverend Rob McCoy false witness of blood spluttering. McCoy said that his son, who served as security for Kirk, phoned him soon after.
We have McCoys’s statement on video. Kirk’s security removed the video chips (while leaving the cameras in situ) and disappeared them.
Kirk was taken to a hospital far away, and not the nearest available hospital.
According to gun experts from US Special forces, the explosive that killed Kirk was a muted device, most likely hidden under his shirt and attached to his microphone. (Stew Peters)
Peters recalls that in Lebanon, Israeli secret services attached such devices to telephone pagers, which exploded, killing thousands of Lebanese users (some unrelated to Hamas).
Kirk was murdered because, as the images of Arab children in Gaza, were bombed, maimed, slaughtered over a period of two years, appeared on US social media, the younger generation of Americans (below 40 years) regained their consciences and asked why the US government was financing, aiding and abetting this “demonic state” (Candace Owens).
Candace has gone further to “allege” that the US government might have known or been aware of the intention by foreign agents to murder Kirk.
Since TPUSA had been instrumental in Trump’s election, losing that youthful generation would not only disadvantage the Republicans, it would place them in a losing position in the future.
Kirk must be taken out.
There is growing evidence that Kirk did tell his closest friends that Israel would have him killed. Erika Kirk revealed a curious piece of evidence.
In a meeting with Jewish donors in the “Hamptons” (an upscale New York suburb) in August, the first question posed to Kirk was: “God forbid if something happens to you, what will happen to Turning Point, USA?” (Erika is on tape).
Erika marriage to Kirk was not accidental. She had worked for Trump in a Miss America pageant, becoming a Miss Arizona.
Kirk had worked for Trump in 2016. Erika’s father, Ken Frantzve, a Zionist, is said to have been a Raytheon Armaments Corporation representative in Israel, responsible for setting up the Iron Dome (missile Defense).
Losing Republican support (by losing Kirk’s support) threatened US financial support for Raytheon arms supplies to Israel.
These kinds of people to “take out” any threat, human or otherwise, that stands in their way.
The quick response to the death of Kirk; Erika appearing in a US$3 000 white designer outfit a few days after the death of her husband, being elected as chief officer of Turning Point organisation in less than three months, suggests pre-planning.
Youtubers say Erika (the grieving widow) shed a tear only in one eye (they have it on zoom photos), a suggestion that the funeral events were choreographed in advance.
Evidence presented by activists listed above, “allegedly” point towards some form of collaboration between the US government and Israel in the death of Kirk.
Why? You decide.
*Ken Mufuka is a Zimbabwean patriot.
