The climate crisis is not a gender-neutral phenomenon. Its impacts are unevenly distributed, often amplifying existing inequalities within societies.
Rural women, especially in low- and middle-income countries, find themselves at the epicentre of this injustice.
While entire communities are affected by droughts, floods, heatwaves, and changing weather patterns, women disproportionately bear the brunt due to structural inequalities in access to resources, decision-making power, and opportunities.
The climate crisis is, therefore, not just an environmental challenge but also a matter of social justice, gender equity, and human rights.
Rural women are heavily involved in agriculture, natural resource management, and household caregiving. In many developing countries, including Zimbabwe and across sub-Saharan Africa, women constitute the majority of smallholder farmers, producing much of the food consumed domestically.
Yet, they often lack secure land tenure, access to credit, irrigation facilities, or improved seeds that could make their livelihoods more resilient to climate shocks.
When droughts or floods wipe out crops, rural women lose both their source of income and the food that sustains their households.
Research shows that female-headed households often face higher economic losses from climate-related disasters than male-headed ones.
- Open letter to President Mnangagwa
- Feature: ‘It’s worse right now than under Mugabe’: Sikhala pays the price of opposition in solitary cell
- Masvingo turns down fire tender deal
- Human-wildlife conflict drive African wild dogs to extinction
Keep Reading
This is not because women are less skilled or less hardworking, but because they are systematically disadvantaged in resource allocation.
For instance, they may be excluded from extension services that provide training on climate-smart agriculture or denied access to insurance schemes.
The result is a widening gender gap in resilience: women lose more, recover slower, and remain trapped in cycles of vulnerability.
Beyond direct financial losses, rural women also shoulder invisible, unpaid costs as climate change worsens household hardships.
When crops fail, it is often women who must stretch limited food supplies, forage for alternative sources, or skip meals so that children and men can eat.
When water sources dry up, women and girls must walk longer distances to fetch water, reducing the time they can spend on education, paid work, or community engagement.
In many rural societies, women are primary caregivers for children, the sick, and the elderly.
Climate-related disasters increase illness, displacement, and malnutrition, intensifying the burden on women’s already overstretched time and energy.
This unpaid labour is rarely accounted for in economic assessments of climate change, yet it represents a significant hidden cost.
It further limits women’s ability to pursue opportunities that could lift them out of poverty or strengthen their resilience to future shocks.
Adaptation strategies are rarely gender-sensitive. Development programs often assume households are homogenous units where resources and responsibilities are shared equally.
In reality, women may lack decision-making power even within their own families.
For example, a male household head might decide how to spend income from crop sales, while a woman who did most of the farming remains excluded from financial decisions.
This inequality is compounded by broader institutional barriers.
Land ownership laws, cultural norms, and patriarchal systems often prevent women from having secure control over land.
Without land rights, they cannot access loans, adopt new farming technologies, or invest in sustainable practices.
Consequently, their ability to adapt to climate change is curtailed.
Recovery after disasters also reflects these disparities. Studies show that women are less likely to receive post-disaster aid, compensation, or relief packages.
Their voices are often absent in community-level decision-making about rebuilding or resource allocation.
The result is a cycle of marginalization: women are hardest hit by climate shocks, yet least supported in recovery efforts.
The climate crisis affecting rural women in Africa, Asia, and Latin America is not of their making.
Historically, industrialized nations have contributed the bulk of greenhouse gas emissions that drive global warming.
Yet it is rural communities in developing countries, particularly women, who suffer the greatest consequences.
This is a textbook case of climate injustice: those least responsible for the problem are most affected by it.
Moreover, international climate finance often fails to trickle down to grassroots women.
While billions are pledged in global climate funds, much of it is captured by large-scale projects, governments, or institutions.
Rural women’s cooperatives, local organisations, and community-led initiatives—which often have the best knowledge of local contexts—remain underfunded.
Bridging this gap requires intentional efforts to make climate finance accessible to women at the grassroots.
While rural women are victims of climate injustice, they are also powerful agents of change.
Across the world, women are leading innovative responses to climate challenges: practicing agroecology, conserving seeds, managing water resources, and forming cooperatives to strengthen resilience.
Their knowledge of local ecosystems, biodiversity, and food systems is invaluable for sustainable solutions.
What is needed is a shift from viewing women merely as vulnerable populations to recognizing them as key stakeholders in climate action.
Policies must prioritise women’s access to land, finance, technology, and decision-making platforms.
Programmes should integrate gender-responsive approaches, ensuring that adaptation strategies address women’s specific needs and harness their potential contributions.
The climate crisis deepens pre-existing inequalities, making life disproportionately harder for rural women.
This injustice cannot be addressed by environmental solutions alone—it requires social transformation.
Governments, civil society, and international organizations must adopt a holistic approach that combines climate action with gender equality.
In Zimbabwe, for example, policies that promote women’s land rights, support female farmer cooperatives, and expand access to climate-smart technologies could significantly reduce vulnerability.
Globally, climate finance mechanisms must be restructured to ensure direct support for grassroots women’s groups.
Ultimately, addressing the gendered impacts of climate change is not just about fairness—it is about effectiveness.
A climate strategy that sidelines half the population is doomed to fail.
By centering rural women in climate policies and investments, the world can not only correct an injustice but also unlock powerful pathways to resilience and sustainability.
The climate crisis is unjust for rural women because it magnifies structural inequalities while placing heavier burdens on those already disadvantaged.
Rural women lose more, recover slower, and carry hidden costs that rarely feature in economic assessments.
Yet they also hold untapped potential to lead transformative climate action.
Recognising, empowering, and supporting rural women is essential not only for justice but also for building resilient communities in the face of an increasingly unstable climate.
