Across Zimbabwe, thousands of young people are preparing to graduate this year. Families will celebrate. Universities and colleges will post photographs of gowns, certificates and smiling faces. Parents will breathe a sigh of relief after years of paying fees.
But beneath the celebrations lies an uncomfortable question: what happens the morning after graduation?
Where is the job?
Where is the opportunity?
Where is the assurance that the qualification they have spent years earning will translate into a livelihood?
For many graduates, graduation is presented as the beginning of adulthood. But in Zimbabwe, it can also mark the beginning of another long and painful wait.
Official unemployment figures can sometimes hide the real picture. ZimStat currently reports an overall unemployment rate of 20.7% for people aged 15 and above in Q2 2025.
Meanwhile, the World Bank reports that 97.3% of employed young people aged 15–24 were in informal employment in 2022.
- Another star plots DeMbare exit
- Biti’s applications for referral to Concourt continues
- Biti plays political card in assault case
- Let’s concentrate on what is on the docket: Reza told Biti
Keep Reading
This matters because unemployment is not simply about having absolutely nothing to do. A graduate selling goods on the streets, driving a taxi, doing casual work or surviving through piece jobs may technically be working.
But if that work has nothing to do with their training, offers no security and barely pays for basic necessities, we must ask whether we are really talking about employment — or survival.
The tragedy is that Zimbabwe has educated a generation it has not adequately prepared to employ.
A young person can spend four years, five years or more studying engineering, law, journalism, teaching, accounting, information technology or another profession, only to emerge into a labour market with limited opportunities.
And what happens to the dream?
For some, it survives. They create businesses, freelance, migrate, acquire additional skills or build careers through unconventional routes. But others watch their ambitions slowly disappear.
Imagine graduating at 22 and still being unemployed at 27.
Imagine sending hundreds of applications and receiving silence.
Imagine watching classmates leave the country, relatives secure jobs through connections, while you remain at home wondering whether the qualification hanging on your wall has any value.
Eventually, disappointment becomes exhaustion.
And exhaustion can become hopelessness.
This is why we should stop reducing youth unemployment to statistics. Behind every percentage is a human being — somebody's son or daughter, somebody who had ambitions, somebody who once believed they could become a doctor, architect, journalist, scientist, entrepreneur, teacher or artist.
Zimbabwe's youth unemployment problem is particularly serious because young people make up a huge proportion of the country's population.
The African Development Bank cited youth unemployment of 27.9% among those aged 15–35 in Q1 2024, while youth not in employment, education or training was estimated at 2.3 million, or 48.9%.
These are not numbers we can afford to ignore.
And there is another danger.
When legitimate opportunities disappear, illegal opportunities can become attractive.
Unemployment does not automatically turn young people into criminals, but prolonged economic exclusion can create fertile ground for harmful alternatives. Zimbabwe is already battling a growing drug and substance-abuse crisis.
Unicef describes substance abuse among young people as a serious public-health and social threat, while Zimbabwe's 2024–2030 multisectoral plan notes that socio-economic hardship, depression and stress contribute to drug use.
Some young people become drug users. Others become involved in drug peddling and other illicit economies. Some turn to gambling. Others become trapped in exploitative relationships or dangerous migration routes. Many simply lose hope.
We must therefore be careful when telling unemployed graduates to "just hustle."
Hustling is admirable when it is a choice. It becomes painful when it is the only option available to someone who spent years acquiring professional skills.
There is nothing shameful about selling vegetables after graduating. There is nothing shameful about driving a taxi. There is nothing shameful about informal work.
The shame would be allowing an entire generation to believe that this is the only economic future available to them.
So, what should be done?
First, Zimbabwe needs to move beyond producing graduates and start deliberately producing jobs.
Universities, colleges, industry and government must work together to identify the skills the economy actually needs. Education cannot operate in isolation from the labour market.
Second, internships and apprenticeships must become meaningful pathways into employment rather than opportunities where young people work for months without pay or prospects.
Third, government must make it easier for young people to start and grow businesses.
Access to affordable finance, markets, digital infrastructure, mentorship and simplified registration can turn an unemployed graduate into an employer.
There are already examples worth building on. An ILO programme supporting young entrepreneurs in Zimbabwe reported that more than 1,017 businesses had improved their output, with 80% expanding into new or related business lines.
But such interventions must move from being isolated projects to becoming part of a national employment strategy with measurable targets.
Fourth, Zimbabwe must invest aggressively in sectors capable of absorbing large numbers of young people — manufacturing, agriculture and agro-processing, construction, technology, tourism, renewable energy and the creative industries.
Fifth, mental-health support must be part of the unemployment response. A graduate who has spent years unemployed should not be treated as lazy or lacking ambition. The psychological consequences of prolonged unemployment are real.
Finally, young people themselves must be included in designing employment policies. We cannot continue designing programmes for young people while barely listening to them.
Zimbabwe's graduates do not need another motivational speech telling them to work hard.
They have already worked hard.
They need an economy that rewards effort.
They need institutions that open doors.
They need opportunities that allow their qualifications, creativity and ambitions to become productive.
And those who have already given up need something even more fundamental: a reason to believe again.
Graduation should not be the moment when Zimbabwe tells its young people, "Congratulations, now figure it out yourself."
It should be the beginning of a national commitment that says: we invested in your education, and we will not abandon you when you step into the world of work.
Because when a country leaves its young people without jobs, it does not merely waste labour.
It wastes dreams.
And eventually, a nation that wastes the dreams of its youth risks wasting its own future.
